It was described especially for the colonies they had because the people in the colonies did look different than them. They must have thought that since they looked different on the outside then they were different on the inside. It also showed how they thought westerners were definitely very ignorant because they described them as unable of understanding the orient without putting in the stereotype they have. They were thought to be uncultured by western society but most never bothered to learn the cultures of the different countries. They thought of the other non-western countries being more savage, and even primitive, and have continued to today. Westernized society is still see as superior and better. Racism is still a big issue. The idea that the west is white, so they are better, is still seen. the view of us versus them is definitely still clearly seen. The middle east is still seen as bad and evil. Many think that all Muslims are terrorists and that they are here to harm us, the west. Not all think this way but many think Christianity is better and Islamic and paganism, seen as non-western civilization is bad.
When I was younger when I though of the word orient my mind went to the Chinese. I didn't realize that the term was used to describe basically all non-western countries. I didn't really know until I read the passage in the McKay book actually. It's weird how people think they can just lump unrelated things and cultures together. People from the middle east are very different to people in Asia. Arabs are different than Indians. They really should not be all described as the orient. The Disney Corporation has been having this problem with the movie Aladdin. They seem to be having a lot of trouble finding the right actors and actresses for the live action. For some reason they can't find Arabs to cast for the movie. Hollywood doesn't seem to have many Arabs that are mainstreamed and popular and they haven't really looked elsewhere. I think they said the actor for the character Aladdin is actually Indian and people are upset about it.
I think an important thing to take away from this topic and this term is that these cultures struggled because they were all put in one group and they had an awful stereotype from the Western people, and putting people into groups does so much harm and doesn't help anyone.
works cited
McKay, John P., et al. A History of Western Society. Bedford/St. Martins, 2017
Gaillot, Ann-Derrick. “Disney's Biggest Problem Isn't Casting, It's Racism.” The Outline, The Outline, 13 July 2017, theoutline.com/post/1909/disney-aladdin-remake-casting-racism?zd=2&zi=idmhrtff.
I think this is all very interesting. It is most interesting because history has still never corrected itself, within this topic. Many are still fighting against it. Whites believe they have always been here "first". They believe they have always had or made everything first. Obviously that is not the truth. Many are working to fix this and correct history, but I often wonder how long it will take or if it will ever be truly fixed.
ReplyDeleteI think this action, of grouping together everyone who's skin color wasn't white, says a lot about the deeper meaning behind the idea of white superiority. It is obvious that whites thought of themselves as the superior race, but I think orientalism shows a different side of that superiority. They grouped together three extremely different cultures under one category. To me this can be interpreted as, not only do whites know they are the superior race, but that every other race is so inferior they don't even deserve to be separated. It is just the white race, then everyone else.
ReplyDeleteI agree with Marlea on the idea that white people always believe that everything that happens is because of them. This is an issue that we are never going to be able to stop. Unfortunately as soon as we make progress towards fixing this problem, someone always steps up and says something racist. It is a problem that I hope we can fix but unfortunately do not believe that we will.
ReplyDelete